Prediction of Mike Cahill vs Peter Fleming Head-to-Head, At

Wojtek Kolan

Our Predictions

H2H Records Career Stats

HEAD TO HEAD
M. Cahill vs P. Fleming

Mike Cahill

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Peter Fleming

USA

1

Win

Played

1

Win

Age

Height

Ret.

C. Rank

Ret.

Best Rank

Total Titles

YTD Titles

Career Money

Plays

Head-to-head: Cahill 1 - 1 Fleming

They have played 4 sets in total, with Mike Cahill winning 2 and Peter Fleming winning 2. The last match between Peter Fleming and Mike Cahill was at the Philadelphia WCT, 23-01-1978, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Peter Fleming getting the victory 6-3 7-6.

Players	Head To Head Match Wins
Cahill	1
Fleming	1

Last 2 H2H Matches:

(R3) Philadelphia WCT(01-23-78)

Stats

Peter Fleming

Mike Cahill

(R3) Cincinnati(07-12-76)

Stats

Mike Cahill

Peter Fleming

M. Cahill vs P. Fleming H2H Profile

M. Cahill	Stats	P. Fleming
$0	Career Prize Money	$0
43.45% (126-164)	Career Total W/L	51.79% (231-215)
1	Clay	0
0	Indoor	1
1	Titles	4
1	Total H2H Matches	1
0% (0-0)	YTD Win/Loss	0% (0-0)

M. Cahill vs P. Fleming Match Preview:

Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Mike Cahill has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Peter Fleming has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Mike Cahill, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Peter Fleming has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
Under pressure analysis: Mike Cahill has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Peter Fleming has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
Performance overview: Over the last year Mike Cahill has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/0), with Peter Fleming winning 0% (W/L 0/0) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
Best surface: Mike Cahill has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 41/43), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 30% (W/L 3/7). Peter Fleming has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 49% (W/L 94/77), and worse career win % on N/A, winning 0% (W/L 0/1).
Player level: In the last year, Mike Cahill has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0), where as Peter Fleming has played most of their matches on the N/A, winning 0% of matches (W/L 0/0). When comparing stats between players to predict the favorite, it is of course all relative to the event level they have been playing at.
Direct H2H matches: They have played 2 times before with Mike Cahill winning 1 times and Peter Fleming being victorious 1 times. They have played 4 sets in total, with Mike Cahill winning 2 and Peter Fleming winning 2.
The last match between Mike Cahill and Peter Fleming was at the Philadelphia WCT, 23-01-1978, Round: R3, Surface: Carpet, with Peter Fleming getting the victory 6-3 7-6.
Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:0:0.
Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Mike Cahill has played against opponents with an average rank of 0 while Peter Fleming has played against players with an average rank of 0.
Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Mike Cahill has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Peter Fleming has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
Break point conversion: In recent form, Mike Cahill has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Peter Fleming has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.

Mike Cahill vs Peter Fleming Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.

M. Cahill vs P. Fleming H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions

M. Cahill	Stats	P. Fleming
1	H2H Matches Won	1
2	Sets Won	2
21	Games Won	18
0:0:0	Average Match Time	0:0:0
50% (1/2)	Best‑of‑3 Win %	50% (1/2)
100% (1/1)	1st Set Won, Won Match	100% (1/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	0% (0/1)
0% (0/1)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	0% (0/1)

Recent Performance Stats

M. Cahill Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Indianapolis - 01-08-1983
R2 Jairo VelascoJ. Velasco	L	7-5 6-2	Stats
Houston-WCT - 04-04-1983
R3 Steve DentonS. Denton	L	6-4 6-3	Stats
Dortmund WCT - 15-11-1982
R3 Chip HooperC. Hooper	L	7-5 3-6 6-3	Stats
Maui - 27-09-1982
R4 Mike BauerM. Bauer	W	6-1 7-6	Stats
R3 Robert Vant HofR. Vant	W	7-6 7-6	Stats

View All

P. Fleming Recent Matches Played

OPPONENT	RESULT	SCORE	H2H
Wembley - 10-11-1987
R3 Alexander VolkovA. Volkov	L	6-2 4-6 6-2	Stats
Stockholm - 02-11-1987
R2 Sergio CasalS. Casal	L	6-3 6-7 6-1	Stats
Bergen CH - 26-10-1987
R3 Claudio PanattaC. Panatta	W	7-6 6-2	Stats
R4 Grant ConnellG. Connell	L	6-4 3-6 6-1	Stats
San Francisco - 28-09-1987
R3 Woody HuntW. Hunt	L	7-5 6-4	Stats

View All

M. Cahill vs P. Fleming Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents

M. Cahill	Stats	P. Fleming
43.45% (126/164)	YTD Win/Loss	51.80% (230/214)
45.31% (304/367)	Sets Win/Loss	52.01% (581/536)
48.44% (3067/3265)	Games Win/Loss	50.88% (5498/5307)
48.81% (41/43)	Hard Win/Loss	54.97% (94/77)
47.76% (64/70)	Clay Win/Loss	38.60% (22/35)
29.03% (18/44)	Indoor Hard W/L	56.47% (96/74)
30.00% (3/7)	Grass Win/Loss	40.00% (18/27)
1st Match	Average Match Time	1st Match
625.61	Average Opponent Rank	557.08
33.33% (5/10)	Slam W/L	46.00% (23/27)
45.00% (9/11)	Masters W/L	52.78% (19/17)
38.91% (86/135)	Main Tour W/L	51.85% (182/169)
76.47% (26/8)	Challenger W/L	85.71% (6/1)
43% (118/273)	Best of 3 Sets Win %	53% (209/397)
36% (4/11)	Best of 5 Sets Win %	43% (19/44)
0% (0/1)	Tiebreaks Win % (Total)	0% (0/0)
42% (35/83)	Deciding Set Win %	46% (73/159)
77% (145/111)	1st Set Won, Won Match	81% (240/194)
23% (145/34)	1st Set Won, Lost Match	19% (240/46)
10% (144/15)	1st Set Lost, Won Match	18% (204/36)